2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1967 Opel Record
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Opel Record. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Opel Record would be higher. At 2,511 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Opel Record is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1967 Opel Record. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1967 Opel Record.
Because 1967 Opel Record is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Opel Record. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Opel Record (152 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (149 Nm). This means 1967 Opel Record will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1967 Opel Record | |
Make | Daewoo | Opel |
Model | Rezzo | Record |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 2511 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 152 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2670 mm |