2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1968 Seat 1500
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1968 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1968 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 110 kg more than 1968 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Seat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Seat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1968 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Seat |
| Model | Rezzo | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2660 mm |
