2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1972 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1972 Triumph Spitfire. (47 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 490 kg more than 1972 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph Spitfire. (83 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1972 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Daewoo | Triumph |
Model | Rezzo | Spitfire |
Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2110 mm |