2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1976 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Toyota Mark II (107 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 75 kg more than 1976 Toyota Mark II.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Toyota Mark II (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1976 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1976 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Daewoo | Toyota |
Model | Rezzo | Mark II |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2590 mm |