2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1980 Seat Ritmo

To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 390 kg more than 1980 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat Ritmo.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Daewoo Rezzo 1980 Seat Ritmo
Make Daewoo Seat
Model Rezzo Ritmo
Year Released 2000 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1761 cc 1197 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 97 HP 63 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 149 Nm 92 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1270 kg 880 kg
Vehicle Length 4360 mm 3950 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1590 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2460 mm