2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 360 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 360 (101 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 360 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 170 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Volvo 360 (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Volvo 360 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
Make | Daewoo | Volvo |
Model | Rezzo | 360 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.5 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2410 mm |