2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 50 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Daewoo | Oldsmobile |
Model | Rezzo | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2680 mm |