2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 95 kg more than 1985 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
| Make | Daewoo | Plymouth |
| Model | Rezzo | Sundance |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2470 mm |
