2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1986 Fiat Croma

To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Fiat Croma (120 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 150 kg more than 1986 Fiat Croma.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Fiat Croma (165 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1986 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Daewoo Rezzo 1986 Fiat Croma
Make Daewoo Fiat
Model Rezzo Croma
Year Released 2000 1986
Body Type Minivan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1761 cc 1994 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 97 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 149 Nm 165 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80.5 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.5 mm 90 mm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1270 kg 1120 kg
Vehicle Length 4360 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1590 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2670 mm