2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1986 Honda Civic
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Honda Civic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Honda Civic would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Honda Civic (125 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 370 kg more than 1986 Honda Civic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Honda Civic. (142 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1986 Honda Civic | |
Make | Daewoo | Honda |
Model | Rezzo | Civic |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 75.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.5 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2210 mm |