2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1991 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,305 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 97 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 120 kg more than 1991 Ford Tempo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Ford Tempo (175 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1991 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1991 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Rezzo | Tempo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 2305 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 93.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.5 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2540 mm |