2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1992 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 170 kg more than 1992 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Nissan Pulsar. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1992 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Daewoo | Nissan |
Model | Rezzo | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2440 mm |