2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura TL would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (176 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 2000 Daewoo Rezzo has manual transmission. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Daewoo | Acura |
Model | Rezzo | TL |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2840 mm |