2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1996 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 298 kg more than 1996 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Rezzo | Midge |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 149 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1400 mm |