2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2001 Volvo SCC
To start off, 2001 Volvo SCC is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 2,521 cc, 2001 Volvo SCC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo SCC (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo SCC should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Volvo SCC weights approximately 181 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo SCC (285 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (149 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo SCC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. 2001 Volvo SCC has automatic transmission and 2000 Daewoo Rezzo has manual transmission. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo SCC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 2001 Volvo SCC | |
Make | Daewoo | Volvo |
Model | Rezzo | SCC |
Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 2521 cc |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 285 Nm |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1451 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2720 mm |