2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2003 Holden Rodeo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Holden Rodeo (145 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Because 2003 Holden Rodeo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Holden Rodeo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Holden Rodeo (280 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Daewoo | Holden |
Model | Rezzo | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3060 mm |