2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1152 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (149 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Rezzo | E-350 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 475 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 2422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3510 mm |