2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2004 Scion xB
To start off, 2004 Scion xB is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Scion xB (108 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Scion xB should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 160 kg more than 2004 Scion xB.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (149 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Scion xB. (142 Nm). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Scion xB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 2004 Scion xB | |
| Make | Daewoo | Scion |
| Model | Rezzo | xB |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.5 mm | 85 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2510 mm |
