2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2006 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Stavic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Stavic should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Stavic (312 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Stavic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. 2006 SsangYong Stavic has automatic transmission and 2000 Daewoo Rezzo has manual transmission. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 SsangYong Stavic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 2006 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | Daewoo | SsangYong |
| Model | Rezzo | Stavic |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 89.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.5 mm | 84 mm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3010 mm |
