2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 2,460 cc, 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle (172 HP) has 75 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 108 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle (315 Nm @ 2950 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 2006 Volkswagen Caravelle | |
Make | Daewoo | Volkswagen |
Model | Rezzo | Caravelle |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 2460 cc |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 172 HP |
Torque | 149 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1162 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3010 mm |