2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. 2008 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 2000 Daewoo Rezzo has manual transmission. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Daewoo | Rover |
Model | Rezzo | 75 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 149 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.5 mm | 82.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2750 mm |