2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2009 Ford Ka
To start off, 2009 Ford Ka is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 2009 Ford Ka | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Rezzo | Ka |
Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.5 mm | 75.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2450 mm |