2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (149 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Daewoo | Holden |
Model | Rezzo | Cruze |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 149 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2685 mm |