2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2010 Peugeot 4007
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 4007 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 4007 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 4007 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 4007 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Because 2010 Peugeot 4007 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 4007 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 4007 (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 4007 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 2010 Peugeot 4007 | |
Make | Daewoo | Peugeot |
Model | Rezzo | 4007 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.5 mm | 87 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |