2000 Daihatsu YRV vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Daihatsu YRV is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daihatsu YRV (88 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daihatsu YRV should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 165 kg more than 2000 Daihatsu YRV.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daihatsu YRV (123 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Daihatsu YRV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daihatsu YRV | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Nissan |
| Model | YRV | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1298 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 88 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1085 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2540 mm |
