2000 Daihatsu YRV vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2000 Daihatsu YRV is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Daihatsu YRV. (88 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2000 Daihatsu YRV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 442 kg more than 2000 Daihatsu YRV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daihatsu YRV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Daihatsu YRV 1966 Mercury Cougar
Make Daihatsu Mercury
Model YRV Cougar
Year Released 2000 1966
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1298 cc 4728 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 88 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4400 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 920 kg 1362 kg
Vehicle Length 3770 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2350 mm 2830 mm