2000 Daihatsu YRV vs. 1984 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 2000 Daihatsu YRV is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 2,759 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 165 kg more than 2000 Daihatsu YRV.
Because 1984 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daihatsu YRV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daihatsu YRV | 1984 Toyota Cressida | |
Make | Daihatsu | Toyota |
Model | YRV | Cressida |
Year Released | 2000 | 1984 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 2759 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 72.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.7 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 75 L |