2000 Daihatsu YRV vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daihatsu YRV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daihatsu YRV would be higher. At 1,298 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daihatsu YRV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daihatsu YRV (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daihatsu YRV should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daihatsu YRV weights approximately 290 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Daihatsu YRV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Tata Nano. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daihatsu YRV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daihatsu YRV (120 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Daihatsu YRV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daihatsu YRV | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | Daihatsu | Tata |
Model | YRV | Nano |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.7 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.8 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 37 L |