2000 Dodge Avenger vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2000 Dodge Avenger is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Avenger weights approximately 75 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Because 1952 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Avenger. (232 Nm). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Avenger.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Avenger | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Avenger | XK |
Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 232 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 63 L |