2000 Dodge Avenger vs. 1960 Land Rover 88
To start off, 2000 Dodge Avenger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Land Rover 88. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Land Rover 88 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Land Rover 88 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2000 Dodge Avenger.
Because 1960 Land Rover 88 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Dodge Avenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Land Rover 88 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Avenger (232 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Land Rover 88. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Land Rover 88. 2000 Dodge Avenger has automatic transmission and 1960 Land Rover 88 has manual transmission. 1960 Land Rover 88 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Dodge Avenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Avenger | 1960 Land Rover 88 | |
Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
Model | Avenger | 88 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2286 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 232 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2240 mm |