2000 Dodge Avenger vs. 1963 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2000 Dodge Avenger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Avenger weights approximately 338 kg more than 1963 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Dodge Avenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Avenger (232 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jeep CJ5. 2000 Dodge Avenger has automatic transmission and 1963 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Dodge Avenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Avenger | 1963 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Avenger | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 232 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2060 mm |