2000 Dodge Avenger vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 2000 Dodge Avenger is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Avenger weights approximately 572 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Because 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Avenger (232 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. (185 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Avenger | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Dodge | Reliant |
| Model | Avenger | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 232 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 798 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 38 L |
