2000 Dodge Avenger vs. 1967 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2000 Dodge Avenger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Avenger weights approximately 488 kg more than 1967 Triumph Vitesse.
Because 1967 Triumph Vitesse is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Triumph Vitesse. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Avenger (232 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph Vitesse. (125 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Avenger | 1967 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Avenger | Vitesse |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 232 Nm | 125 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 882 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 40 L |