2000 Dodge Avenger vs. 1978 ZIL 4104
To start off, 2000 Dodge Avenger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,695 cc (8 cylinders), 1978 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 ZIL 4104 weights approximately 1966 kg more than 2000 Dodge Avenger.
Because 1978 ZIL 4104 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 ZIL 4104. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 ZIL 4104 (608 Nm) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Avenger. (232 Nm). This means 1978 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Avenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Avenger | 1978 ZIL 4104 | |
| Make | Dodge | ZIL |
| Model | Avenger | 4104 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 7695 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 311 HP |
| Torque | 232 Nm | 608 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 3336 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2090 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3340 mm |
