2000 Dodge Avenger vs. 1981 GAZ 24
To start off, 2000 Dodge Avenger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 GAZ 24. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 GAZ 24 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 GAZ 24 weights approximately 28 kg more than 2000 Dodge Avenger.
Because 1981 GAZ 24 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 GAZ 24. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Dodge Avenger has automatic transmission and 1981 GAZ 24 has manual transmission. 1981 GAZ 24 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Dodge Avenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Avenger | 1981 GAZ 24 | |
| Make | Dodge | GAZ |
| Model | Avenger | 24 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2304 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 164 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2810 mm |
