2000 Dodge Avenger vs. 1997 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Dodge Avenger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford Ranger weights approximately 25 kg more than 2000 Dodge Avenger.
Because 1997 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Avenger (232 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Ranger. (198 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Avenger | 1997 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Avenger | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 232 Nm | 198 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2840 mm |