2000 Dodge Avenger vs. 2001 MCC Smart
To start off, 2001 MCC Smart is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Avenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Avenger would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Avenger weights approximately 650 kg more than 2001 MCC Smart.
Because 2001 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Avenger (232 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 MCC Smart. (89 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Avenger | 2001 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Dodge | MCC |
| Model | Avenger | Smart |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 232 Nm | 89 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 2600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 1820 mm |
