2000 Dodge Caravan vs. 1966 Mercury Comet

To start off, 2000 Dodge Caravan is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (198 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Caravan. (131 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Caravan.

Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (382 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Caravan. (174 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Caravan.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Dodge Caravan 1966 Mercury Comet
Make Dodge Mercury
Model Caravan Comet
Year Released 2000 1966
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 4738 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 131 HP 198 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 174 Nm 382 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 2400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 5000 mm
Vehicle Width 1960 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1790 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2950 mm