2000 Dodge Dakota vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 461 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Dakota | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Dakota | Cedric |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4699 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 115 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2540 mm |