2000 Dodge Dakota vs. 1976 Lotus Eclat
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Lotus Eclat. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Dakota | 1976 Lotus Eclat | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Dakota | Eclat |
Year Released | 2000 | 1976 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4699 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2490 mm |