2000 Dodge Dakota vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Dakota | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
Model | Dakota | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4699 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2680 mm |