2000 Dodge Dakota vs. 1983 Lancia Gamma
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lancia Gamma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lancia Gamma would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Lancia Gamma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 401 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Lancia Gamma. (175 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Lancia Gamma. 1983 Lancia Gamma has automatic transmission and 2000 Dodge Dakota has manual transmission. 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Lancia Gamma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Dakota | 1983 Lancia Gamma | |
Make | Dodge | Lancia |
Model | Dakota | Gamma |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4699 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 116 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2680 mm |