2000 Dodge Dakota vs. 1983 Maserati Merak
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Maserati Merak. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Maserati Merak would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Maserati Merak (157 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Dakota. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Maserati Merak should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 180 kg more than 1983 Maserati Merak.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Maserati Merak. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Dakota | 1983 Maserati Merak | |
Make | Dodge | Maserati |
Model | Dakota | Merak |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Size | 2458 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2610 mm |