2000 Dodge Dakota vs. 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma

To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 458 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma. (118 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Dodge Dakota 1984 Mitsubishi Sigma
Make Dodge Mitsubishi
Model Dakota Sigma
Year Released 2000 1984
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4699 cc 1597 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 90 HP
Torque 576 Nm 118 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Length 4980 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2520 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]