2000 Dodge Dakota vs. 1992 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 419 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda 626. (157 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Dakota | 1992 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Dakota | 626 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4699 cc | 1840 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 157 Nm |
Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 192 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2620 mm |