2000 Dodge Dakota vs. 1994 Ford Contour

To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Contour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Contour would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Ford Contour. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Contour. (180 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Contour.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Dodge Dakota 1994 Ford Contour
Make Dodge Ford
Model Dakota Contour
Year Released 2000 1994
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4699 cc 1989 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 129 HP
Torque 576 Nm 180 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4980 mm 4680 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2710 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]