2000 Dodge Dakota vs. 1995 Volkswagen Fusca
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Volkswagen Fusca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Volkswagen Fusca would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Volkswagen Fusca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 471 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Volkswagen Fusca. (105 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Volkswagen Fusca.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Dakota | 1995 Volkswagen Fusca | |
Make | Dodge | Volkswagen |
Model | Dakota | Fusca |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4699 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 52 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2410 mm |