2000 Dodge Dakota vs. 2002 Opel Omega
To start off, 2002 Opel Omega is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Opel Omega. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Dakota (576 Nm) has 367 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Opel Omega. (209 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Dakota | 2002 Opel Omega | |
Make | Dodge | Opel |
Model | Dakota | Omega |
Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4699 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
Torque | 576 Nm | 209 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2740 mm |