2000 Dodge Dakota vs. 2003 Jaguar R-D6
To start off, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar R-D6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 (230 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2000 Dodge Dakota. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 should accelerate faster than 2000 Dodge Dakota. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 30 kg more than 2003 Jaguar R-D6.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Jaguar R-D6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jaguar R-D6 (500 Nm) has 303 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Dodge Dakota. (197 Nm). This means 2003 Jaguar R-D6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Dodge Dakota | 2003 Jaguar R-D6 | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Dakota | R-D6 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2458 cc | 2720 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 500 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2720 mm |