2000 Dodge Dakota vs. 2003 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2003 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 4,699 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 ZAZ Wagon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Dodge Dakota | 2003 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Dodge | ZAZ |
| Model | Dakota | Wagon |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4699 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 50 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2330 mm |
